One website proposes that “If you eliminate seed oils, you eliminate a massive amount of sun damage that could be affecting your skin.”

or this post;

Here are some anecdotes

-to provide a suggestive link;

Here is a list of anecdotal comments;

here are some reddit comments;

Removing seed oils also might cause linoleic acid depletion, assuming you don’t get linolic acid from other sources. So it could be harmful to cut seed oils cold turkey. You can supplement this with beef tallow or someshit. Idk, I’m not a real doctor.

The point is, enough people are experiencing something, and that might warrant a test to find out the truth.

We know for a fact that there are negative side effects to sunscreen, excess UV rays, and seed oils.

So, it’s not a crazy experiment to steer your health into a plausibly better direction by avoiding seed oils.

I mean, if you’re going to do it, do it for your overall health, but also, it might help with sun burn.

Chief most,

you have to understand that the science on anything isn’t definitive and it’s subject to change or being wrong as fuck. To say there is no interaction between Sunburns and Seed Oil consumption is wrong. To say that the impact is negligible might be possible. To say that the impact of seed oil causing bad health causing more prone susceptibility to skin damage from sunlight or UV rays or even other factors, is more plausible of a story than all of the rest. Stories are basically theories, what story do you believe in? Or do you outsource your belief to a religious institution of peer-reviewed priest-doctors citing doctrine under the dogma of science?

Like, do you believe this shit because ‘Harvard’?

That blogpost above doesn’t examine the synergistic negative effects of byproducts and other toxins contained in foods that might compound with seed oils. The post also blames ‘everything else’ besides seed oils. Ha. Okay. Real scientific.

Idk, I’ll trust science and health experts when we stop putting problematic compounds on crops and animal injections that we consume in grocers. Things like ractopamine or azodicarbonamide. These are not natural found in the environment, nor are the chemicals linked to cancer in pesticides found in that whole Monsanto deal, and we’re putting it in or on the food we eventually eat.

Also, Monsanto being cancerous was treated as a conspiracy theory. . . Let that sink in.

Anyways, if anyone anywhere Claims something as a definitive objective immutable truth, they are likely wrong as fuck.

Like saying “no, your diet doesn’t cause sunburn“, is either a superficial statement or wrong as fuck. Like you’re telling me my health affected by my diet doesn’t have anything to do with my ability to be damaged by the sun or my regeneration rate? Suck a dick.

The truth in all of this is probably something along the lines of ‘better health and better diet causes more regeneration and less damage, including damage from the sun’ – This statement is a broad generalized truth.

It’s the subjective part about what is ‘better’ health and ‘better’ diet that is up to speculation- and to what degree is ‘damage’ or ‘regeneration’ affected by your health and diet.

In Closing,

Well, you could avoid the sun, avoid seed oils, use banned Korean Sunblock, Beef Tallow sunscreen, or raw dog the sun.

I personally think Sunscreen is a scam, and FDA regulations have banned Newer and modern technology Sunscreen from Korea, so get fucked.

Seed oils in general are bad for you, and a lot of proponents online say that there are links to this shit.

Are Seed oils related to sun burn? Maybe. Who the fuck knows. People will test all sorts of shit and blame one thing for a positive change, but at the bare minimum, if it’s a positive change, then it might be good. We’ll have to see the side effects of these changes as they amplify over time.

And I make no recommendations or advice, so do what you will.

*Not Valid Financial, Legal, Health, or Any Advice