As with recent cases, a man charged with the alleged assassination of a Health Care/Insurance CEO is being charged with multiple charges to include terrorism.
Some guy, allegedly shot some other guy and they think they found the ‘guy’ allegedly, and now the person is being brought forth terrorist charges.
It’s obvious that there are systemic issues of health insurance companies profiting in a for-profit sick care system killing thousands of people through their methods to not provide the service that their clients are asking for, in an effort to deny, delay, and defend against any and all claims.
As it turns out, the most effective model for health care isn’t you fighting with a service you paid for to delay and deny and hope that you die before they have to actually pay for your medical treatment.
Shocking, I know.
But the main meat of this isn’t the fact that US Health Care is a shithole. It’s the fact that the term terrorism doesn’t mean anything. Here’s the FBI Definition;
The case for why the term terrorism doesn’t mean anything is simple.
The US Government has been reportedly, in declassified self reported documents, and more, engaged in political violence in other countries, to include acts of terrorism, destabilization, and even assassination plots. This also include theories that are with claims supporting that the US government itself has assassinated its own citizenry for political motivations.
Maybe the release of MLK, Malcolm X, JFK files, etc. will reveal some more?
And of course, the US government has never found itself guilty in committing any acts of terrorism. In fact, the US government is still operating under the idea of ‘global war on terror’ as a pseudo metaphysical fight against an ideology (atleast until the Afghanistan pull out in 2020)
The amount of political assassinations both domestic and abroad committed by the United States is not zero. That is a fact.
Because the US Government itself will not self-incriminate itself under it’s own definitions, nor would it be willingly held accountable in an international court of law, or the recent Pandemic in which Nuremberg code violations were a plenty, it’s clear that the word terrorism doesn’t mean anything.
It’s just a charged buzz word.
They’ll label you a terrorist if they don’t like it but won’t label themselves nor look in a mirror.
It’s like when a left-tard calls you a Nazi. A Charged buzzword with nebulously defined definitions that are loose and applied blanketly to every and anything.
The war on terror is likely akin to the war on drugs, an infinity war propped up by the idea that you’re fighting against an idea when in reality you’re perpetuating it. Infinity wars in general are scams and an abuse of executive powers. This also broadly applies to emergency aide and authorizations.
The TLDR is that it’s not terrorism if it’s state sanctioned or funded or by the State (unless a foreign nation calls it terrorism).
To be fair
In the old days, the terrorists of old were called ‘rebels’ or ‘insurrectionists’ or ‘bandits’ or ‘pirates’ or anything not recognized as a lawful party. Essentially the political beliefs and values of a group contesting the status quo of power were always labeled as some sort of non-authoritarian party of disheveled and crazy kooks that ought not to be taken seriously.
In fact, the United States as Revolutionaries were technically terrorists until they received official recognition and support by France. You could make the case that the Boston Tea Party and subsequent insurrection were all acts of politically motivated terrorism using the modern terms.
In any case, Terrorism is just the new political slogan for ‘thing that government doesn’t like’, and another way to enforce state power or status quo.
The use of the word
When you hear headlines news of the word ‘terrorism’ it’s supposed to get you civically motivated to be against the ‘targeted’ people or persons. And the media will try to frame and paint atleast one side as the terrorist and wrongful perpetrators.
Whether that’s Israel or Hamas, or both, it is what it is.
The word is a charged word and is meant to dismiss or write off the complaints or voices of those committing what could be atrocities. Depending on of course, the facts of the matter. Like whose actually doing the terrorism and what is actually being done.
They’ve been doing this since 2001, and probably a lot longer to include all the 1970’s issues and Cold War jazz. I just didn’t give a shit about writing about it until they labeled the Luigi guy as a terrorist for allegedly whacking someone that is responsible for more indirect deaths through claim denials.
See, that’s the thing, systemic violence perpetuated by a pen is ‘clean’ and ‘kosher/halal’ and arguably state sanctioned since they’re collecting their tax monies. The same government that would write policies to take away your guns and send you on a trail of tears or Japanese internment camps resulting in the death of hundreds through policies, is somehow not culpable or capable of terrorism. Eh, I’m going off tangent, I’m going to end this rant.
In Closing
I said what I said, and there’s plenty of evidence to support it if you look for it.
Until the US government finds itself guilty of espionage on it’s own persons (NSA, patriot act, etc) or committing acts of terrorism in both domestic and foreign relations, then I won’t really give a shit what the words or terms they throw around. It’s just hypocritical.
“Oh yea, we do this, but it’s okay. It’s only bad when you do it too” – The State
And declassifying a document or report saying ‘yea we did it’ by the GAO or other three letter alphabet soup isn’t the same as being found formally guilty in a court of law. I’m talking about respecting a pseudo-man made rule of law that way there is an accountable party and some form of reparations, damages, or justice in which the wronged party gets something in return besides simply the truth. In fairness, an international court would be more accurate but again, I’m not hoping for anything.
Good luck getting the US to admit wrong doing. The world is a lot shittier than you think and the US might not actually be the worst of it, shocking, I know.
*Not Valid Financial, Legal, Life, or Any Advice