Ultimately the issue of the ideal or best governing structure has to account for the line of succession. It doesn’t matter if you want communism, a republic, capitalistic enterprise (company towns upgraded to mega blocs and company nations), a monarchy or whatever the fuck form of governing structure or economic model that influence people and lose friends. Because that’s what politicking is nowadays, a guide to lose friends and influence people.
And we can’t have thought police, or it’ll end in self cannibalization due to lack of expression and narrowing of our options as we artificially limit ourselves into a path or corridor in society resulting in collapse. Yea, turns out fascism and censorship aren’t good.
That’s why book burnings are bad, mkay.
So, all government structures suck, the only difference is that some take longer to reward the suck.
Your concern shouldn’t be a regime change between one governing structure and the next, but rather the regime change within, from the switching of seats and the rise of nepotic interests. Nepotism being a sort of necrotic dry rotting swamp from within.
Point being, look at the governments around you. ‘Democracies’ and Republics have gotten lucky in the west and only took one hundred or so years to really reap the corruption to the point of self destruction and self cannibalization. Populations are Christmas treeing, and leading to war or economic barbary to self sustain itself as well as importing humans like cogs in the machine.
As opposed to Monarchies or a more centralized authoritarian fascist structure which can end itself in the first term or the latter term. The latter term being the King’s puppetted nepo baby that turns into a mad king, or some people who really like sending people to gulags *Communists*. Granted, it’s not guaranteed a latter term would end the society, but it’s also increasingly likely that future generational lines of debauchery are going to. The degradation of subsequent generational copies of those with power tend to degrade itself to oblivion.
A burgeoning republic or parliament or whatever just takes longer for the centralization of power to corrupt and coalesce itself into a large unifying faction called the ‘deep state’ rather than many factions fighting based on various disputes. And to be honest, the deep state isn’t an issue until it starts becoming an issue due to rising ideologies and ideological subversion and conquest throwing an imperial boomerang to self destruction.
Speed running your own societies’ collapse isn’t good, even if you decide to wage war on everyone because you think you have a God Emperor or wear cool red armbands.
Ultimately, society has a sort of regenerative health bar, and if the corruption and retarded machinations of that society is less than the regen rate of society, whether perpetuated by the King or the Deep State, then you’ll do alright. When the corruption and kickbacks and private interests out weigh the ability for the state to sustain itself, then it starts fucking with our egg prices and the peasant’s way of living.
Peasants and plebes don’t give a fuck if life is good. Bread and circus baby. If you get retards in power that threaten both bread and circus, then you’re heading for a decline in state. You want people hooked on their copium en masse and able to ignore the plight of the human cattle that get harvested and floosed out into homelessness or some other hand cuff chain. And no, Sprinkling Crack on black neighborhoods or getting people hooked up on lifetime supply of pharmaceutical joy pills or trials to insulin isn’t the solution.
There’s a balance here folks, future Machiavellian types ought to write that down.
We need to somehow account for the rise in power in the line of succession with a balanced education in humanities as well as being smart and not riding lines of cocaine on a government laptop. Even if it’s fun.
And I don’t think the solution is re-education camps, that’s in line with the thought police and that’s how you narrow innovations and get societal collapse. Some form of education or enlightenment to see how things are just equally dumb if we’re being too dumb.
Ultimately you want to not have someone living in an echo chamber of fabricated reality disconnected from nature to the point where they threaten the very fundamentals of statecraft. Turns out, food is important and you can’t just fuck over farmers or labor.
As a side note
The answer to corruption isn’t to eliminate corruption, that’s bad.
The problem is privatization and centralization of corruption.
I think we ought to democratize corruption and allow everyone to partake in it for non violent offences.
And heavily punish those that cause more harm than good rather than charging them for ‘gas fees’ of doing business.
My opinion.
In Closing
The problem is when corruption exceeds bread and circus.
The current solution is to buy time and have decentralized authorities, but that only delays what appears to be the inevitable.
So we ought to figure out a solution that can upgrade the lowest IQ amongst us to Philosopher Kings lest we doom ourselves into having AI overlords or some other form of debauchery that would likely narrow its path into societal collapse based on limited and privatized input.
Ultimately, everything is a bubble and everything will collapse eventually. Just like the price in a stock market, you don’t time the market. We’re in the game of can kicking our life, from one meal to the next, from one government to the next. Survival, is the basis of longevity.
*Not Valid Financial, Legal, Life, or Any Advice